Community
Contribute evidence
Submit a claim with the sources that support it. A reviewer decides what happens next, and the decision is recorded.
What happens to a submission
- It enters moderation with status
pending. - A reviewer approves, rejects, or asks for changes. A reviewer may not decide their own submission — enforced in the application and by a database trigger.
- Approval does not publish the submission as canonical research. Promotion to a research record is a separate editorial act that writes to the revision history.
- Community content does not enter the AI retrieval corpus by default.
Submissions require a configured Supabase project on this deployment. Research pages are unaffected — see deployment status.
What makes a good submission
- A claim narrow enough to evaluate. “Numbers 25:9 and 1 Corinthians 10:8 differ by one thousand” is evaluable; “the Bible is unreliable” is not.
- At least one source a reviewer can check. A source with a URL, an author or an institution, and a date where you have one.
- References in a form the parser can resolve:
John 3:16,1 Cor 15:3-8,Ps 23. - An explanation that separates what the source says from what you conclude from it.